Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
不那么好笑，但是很好看。
观众要求一定要高 不高他们以后就不专注于拍出好的电影了
开心麻花最新作品，可以看出野心很大，涉足了太空科幻领域，特效做的不错，腾子演技也在线，冬梅还是有美的让人心动的时刻，有情怀有致敬，热热闹闹，挺好。
用爱情做幌子也掩盖不了什么。
开心麻花还是执着于往影视作品中塞入各种各样与主体关联不大的段子，时不时地就让人出戏到春晚小品。地球那条线在前半段完全就是累赘，后来则慢慢成为了一条“工具”线，始终都未能自然融入主线叙事。一些概念，比如“中间人”“全球直播”“被遗弃者成英雄”，在实际执行中也没被挖掘出更深层次的价值。很多时候主创还是选择采用了更为稳妥的主流叙事，一些假大空的场面也随之产生。
把所有好评的评论的都赞了一遍，还是那句话，喜剧片的目的就是让人开怀大笑，仅此而已，就好像当初本山大叔的小品一样，你说他有什么特别深的内核嘛？这些人非得鸡蛋里面挑骨头，无病呻吟，你们要挖内核就不该看这种类型的电影，没人把观众当傻子，好看就是好看，最后市场能说明问题，这些自诩着审美高的人别来沾边儿！
开心麻花这次做出了一部能让很多人刮目相看的电影！说真的，好久没在电影院大笑了，另外，沈腾的喜剧节奏是真的好，笑点几乎都被他的表演带起来的。
可以这么说，这部影片看着不错很大程度上都是因为沈腾的精彩表演。沈腾负责了绝大部分能让人笑出来的笑料，扛起了几个煽情时刻，其出色的发挥甚至掩盖了许多剧作上的短板。
严肃部分有“荒月余生”韵味，当然整体格调还是偏向喜剧，全世界都在拍太空戏，但把这出戏拍出“月球是我家，一人也不怕”的幽默范儿可能还真是独此一家。整体特效做得还是不错的，而且沈腾这次的表演比较加分，独角戏演得一点也不虚，以及他的队友金刚鼠某种程度上成了主导全片的关键。将最“绝望”的设定套上最诙谐的过程，再升华成令人唏嘘的结尾……比彗星撞地球的《不要抬头》更温柔，却似乎也比以往的开心麻花更“狠心”。
流浪地球:中国科幻开了一扇门。
好无聊...非要看建议买软座，睡的能更舒服些。 笑梗很烂，为了搞笑而搞笑，全场笑的最多的就一小孩，尤其袋鼠部分，好吵! 最后煽情部分生硬又俗套；特效倒是真不错。 有两个刷脸的角色，黄子韬和辣目洋子，没啥存在的意义。
沈腾领衔主演的喜剧里面最难笑的一部，A级大片的特效和低幼动画一般儿戏的情节搭配主旋律小品一般的煽情，非常无聊。情节割裂，创意缝合，导演和编剧水品的差劲跳过了故事真正的亮点，mv段落多到烦人，两个小时的电影水戏太多，穿插的平民视角尴尬得要死。
配乐很浪漫，剧情甩《流浪地球》十个《星际穿越》（当然星穿还是永远的神）。这个节骨眼，我太需要一些英雄还有光了。
沈马也再次证明默契高的演员哪怕没有面对面依旧可以演出让人拍手叫好的片段。
可爱就够了 剧情什么无所谓了 70s disco 风格的音乐和装扮 中国新年元素也不错 很讨喜
质疑者，直接逮走……这会不会是这剧最接近现实的一个点了？
中国元素挺惊喜的，别的剧情笑点什么的都很一般般看完就忘
《独行月球》是一部能满足喜欢开心麻花电影的观众所有期待的作品。
我非常讨厌往喜剧片里塞煽情的部分，导致我从后半段就几乎笑不出来了，煽情塞进喜剧片里适配度很差
说实话，比好莱坞的纯英雄主义套路更具亲和力。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
