Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
三星半，故事简单，节奏慢，可是挡不住我喜欢西部片，想不通的是为毛主角团个个要送人头
虽然没听大懂搞笑的地方(辣鸡英语我本人... 但是配乐很okay 且没有拖泥带水
2103.
哪怕就是为了看毒液 X Eddie 也快看不下去了
其实看到开头已经觉得不太行了，看到抢银行的戏想着应该要结束了，结果看一下进度条还有一个小时，折磨人的电影，既然选择看了，还是看完吧。一锅乱炖，配乐莫名其妙，节奏没有
网红款卡点，凹造型，扯猫逼神剧，豆瓣评分越来越离谱。就这破片值三星么。
高开走低 cliche 但是 可恶 被他们装到了
好莱坞影视工业的发达，无往不利，高高在上习惯了，捞金捞成了惯性，看着钱多人傻的大陆好灌汤灌迷药，逮住一个IP就赶紧捞，往死里捞，一部成功了，续集弱也赶紧拍赶紧上映赶紧捞，这部差了就再来认真做一把，成功一把后再来烂片捞一把，然后之然后，就这样捞成一部部系列出来，最后还冠名成了经典。5.4/1.87万 【IMDb6.3/6万 北美票房1.97亿30.77万美元，全球票房4.24亿90.77万美元】
夫妻吵架没有隔夜仇，
55/100 大型非裔西部黑帮史诗言情片。阵容这么强大，逻辑方面很不能让人信服，拍的这么平庸太可惜了。
talia ryder下凡演的青春片又是没有跳出公式的老生常谈，男主和她没有cp感，看到后面我已经完全不在乎他们要不要分手。
电影中两个人最后很真诚的把自己内心的想法说出来，给了彼此一个机会，然而现实中的人们就不一定懂得这么处理了……
奇袭红帽唠会嗑，知书达理劫火车，赌只右手炸通天，布坊染具缤纷斗，生死快枪无仁义；精致剥削西部片，众黑哥们的贫嘴比耍枪要好看点，文戏稍显拖沓，结尾反转也大可不必
好有腔调啊！这种片子是一定要存在的，真实的历史往昔一定要被诉说。
好不了了
很难不怀疑是汤老湿看了天生杀人狂之后像毒液一样奋笔疾书的恶搞之作，夫夫吵架斗嘴动手又差点伤及无辜，秀恩爱秀得天旋地转，看完哈欠连天
【C】这拍的都是什么鬼…几乎继承了第一部所有缺点并成倍放大，扁平的角色、白开水的故事、走流程般的叙事、无趣的对白、糟糕的节奏、跑路的逻辑，最难受的是和第一部一样全片都粗糙得就像直接用初稿拍出来的一样，很多情节因为缺乏基础逻辑所以毫无说服力，角色行为逻辑也是个谜。最想吐槽的是屠杀的诞生原因居然这么…我找不到词来形容编剧的偷懒了…
这种随意老古董的我不喜欢，对于女主除了颜值没一点看得上。
甚至看到最后我也不知道俩人到底分没分。。。。。。
还是第一次看美国黑人西部片……看了下导演……一言难尽不敢恭维……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
