Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
2.5 / 姐拍这种暮气沉沉的兴奋剂型爆米花不如去社交网络多骂骂人啊！（但新的子弹时间用法依然远好于《世界上最糟糕的人》）
感觉烂倒不至于，但我觉得三部曲完结挺好的，这部不拍也行，但资本的力量hhh，谁跟钱过不去呢。中途竟把我看困了是怎么回事，而且在重温完三部曲后还是不得不感叹第一部实在是太惊艳了。任何角度看1999年的黑客帝国放在当今都不过时甚至超前
前三部没磕的cp这次磕到了。黑客帝国粉丝太挑了，要是终结者创世纪、黑暗命运能有这水平，早就上8分了。Bugs的演员颇有颜丙燕的神韵。
小时候看黑客帝国，没想到如今真成了程序员，还是人工智能相关。是不是当时埋下的种子呢。从没往这方面想过，却不知不觉走上了这条路。
第四面墙确实破了，期待的中年回顾
Reboot的全面回忆，到底是自我剽窃重复摹仿，还是全盘解构崭新纪元？Neo本是毁灭旧制后新世界的黎明喻体，元叙述怀旧自嘲的故事续写却落入茧缚的loop，如Rey重走Luke银河救世主之路，任何层面都是媚粉保守的无奈叹息，承载深厚期盼的Matrix因而处在商业使命和创新策略夹缝间沦为了影像风格、动作设计、皮囊继承处处暮气沉沉的拙劣产物。人类总在循环错误历史泥泞跋涉，像虚拟程序周而复始。Lilly+Lana才是the Wachowskis，回顾蜕变重生的旧日映射，也是片段闪回和卡司沿用的回首留恋自白。Neo和Trinity超越瞬间永恒，肉身幻象的触碰和对视，才能诠释宇宙最初和最后的爱，日出和黄昏的守候，彩彻区明的希望。叙事已死，媒介尽是废墟，觉醒的女性一跃而飞，似曾相识的心理分析不如看看猫片。
去错影院迟到了10分钟，回家找下载版补完了。我不算系列的死忠粉，对前作的情节也基本没印象（好好好被你们说中我只记得「子弹时间」了），好在期间编导穿插了一些闪回片段，我看着看着还是想起了前三作大概的故事梗概。第四作算是完全舍弃了前三部里对世界真实和虚幻的哲学探讨（对「华纳」和前作的叙事元素动动嘴皮子来个吐槽，顺带提提电子游戏和社交网络的时代病不仅不从容反而令人心酸），完全退化成了二流好莱坞动作爽片：主线从「拯救人类于机器魔爪」变成了「拯救前女友」，动作场面滥用新版的「子弹时间」到令人厌烦，而天降「蜂群」无论是创意还是效果都全面输给速激8里的天降无人车，心疼老胳膊老腿还要亲身上阵的里维斯和莫斯。《超感猎杀》的班底未免人也太多了吧，沃夫冈的造型我是完全没认出来。@红星电影世界吴中路店
纵观云图（我家提克威是好的）到木星，她们要真正融合艺术商业，做到老少咸宜，达到她们想追求的高度，怕还是要很长时间的，是不是华纳等不得了，所以毁自己手里比毁别人手里好啊？[苦涩][苦涩][苦涩]
时代变了，市场不景气了，我相信你能理解为什么我们心爱的母公司华纳兄弟，要决定制作三部曲的续集了吧，他们告诉我，不管有没有我们，他们都会做续集，如果我们不合作，他们会终止我们的合同。（导演值得一星，基努值得一星，其它没有值得一星的了）
真希望不要出这狗屎的第四部，整个像网大的圈钱之作，像官方同人像番外像重启就是不像续集，动作戏没袁和平老爷子的指导整个拉胯
老版《黑客帝国》充满高级感的哲学思辨完全没有了，令人反胃的配角设定和观感却全都保留了下来。整个影片处处透露着疲态，有点《独立日2》那味儿了
怎么说呢？有种看大话西游3的感觉，那部唐嫣演的，一直在说前作多牛逼的电影
4.0。cinity巨幕厅。1.企图用男女主角之爱来穿透象征界的巨大幻象，这不是独属于《黑客帝国》序列的原创，单凭这一点完全可以证实此系列还未找到绝佳的创意点来重启。2.对于实在界而言，机器与人类情感的互通有无，如果能有人机做爱场面，更能在世界观上有所突破。3.配乐很燃。
重启过后全方位降维，前半段还不错，后面开始胡来，崔妮蒂玛丽苏模式开启。小乔虽然是个好演员，但根本无法驾驭史密斯，新墨菲斯也是。希望以后能够再一次重启，黑客帝国系列不应该如此完结。
不对，没有老三部曲的逼格了，打架不戴墨镜还能叫黑客帝国？没有惊艳的动作设计，影像风格更接近于疾速追杀，救世主除了气功啥也不会，很失望，尤其是结局，又是小情侣穿上滑板鞋上天？多打一星纯粹是因为情怀，以及希望还能看到续集
开头的设计还是不错的，但是越到后面越敷衍，最后的动作戏完全就是摆烂了，其精巧程度不如前三部。不过……你都在里面自黑了，我还能再说什么呢……
其实开头的布置不错，Neo被扔回系统改了缓存/记忆，游戏设计师这个主意很不赖，明显是Matrix系列的自我调侃，吐槽华纳以及游戏行业一直延续到彩蛋的大吐特吐更是本片难得的精华，Neo偷偷创造Merphis藏在自己的游戏模拟器里更是神来一笔。。。可是。。。然后就没我然后了。。。其实只要扔掉Trinity这个大烂主意，Neo就是Smith偷偷藏起来备用着给自己某些权限的，然后他们一番哲学争论后，最终还是系统reload ，搞这么个故事很难吗？？中间吐槽吐槽这些年的虚拟世界（互联网梗），甚至缅怀一下Zion往事，也不是不行，我也不需要哲理思辨or人工智能or数字系统原理上有啥新的突破（原三部曲已经很完整了，第三部在思想上已经强弩之末，很难再进阶），就让愿意再进影院的老粉丝重温一下即可，很难吗？？！
你自己可以，但轮到龌龊司机带领全体卡斯满脸大写的“老子不想营业但是老子还要恰饭”你就不满意了，拜托，不要这样双标好不好
2、史密斯和墨菲斯回归 in 闪回，很激动，当然还有黑客众演员
4.0。cinity巨幕厅。1.企图用男女主角之爱来穿透象征界的巨大幻象，这不是独属于《黑客帝国》序列的原创，单凭这一点完全可以证实此系列还未找到绝佳的创意点来重启。2.对于实在界而言，机器与人类情感的互通有无，如果能有人机做爱场面，更能在世界观上有所突破。3.配乐很燃。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
