Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
越来越感觉看Netflix的网大没意思了，根本出不了新活。角色行为的逻辑铺垫很差。
女主哈哈哈，哈哈哈，哈哈哈在尬笑中……就大结局了，她笑点低的会让人误以为会患有精神病的趋势，男主都比她正常，大黄狗都比她有演技，就叫她王多余吧，叫草莓都抬高她
我晕了 我不太懂电影在演什么 除了王彦霖搞笑出演😵💫
哈哈哈这两颗星全给电影最后的林狗和九亿少女的梦，林狗竟然还是个边牧～笑不活了
一个坏人变好的老套情节，因为加入了幻想，竟有了脑洞大开的喜剧效果，电影还可以
结尾略意外。从此，我不再是“寄生虫”。你眼中最丑陋的图案，却是我最爱的玫瑰。当年我选择了可以望得见的三四十年后的生活，现在想重新开始。其实没有任何一个错误，可以随着时间流逝，就慢慢变成对的。除非，你先主动结束这个错误，不惜一切代价。
女主的转变，略微欠缺一点说服力。
男主人演得不错。
中二幻想温暖又治愈，超能力设定很有趣，狗狗马桶演的很棒，但是情感戏很尬……亮点在花妞，哈哈哈
2021.159
居然大家都不喜欢？我怎么觉得超好的电影，虽然劫匪一直不把人绑起来有点急人。妻子对自己的评价那一段，劫匪的I don’t give a fuck,特别是丈夫嘲笑所有人的那句I exist, so therefore, you own me,也许这世界每一个人都会觉得自己的存在才是世界的真理，但只有富人可以做到并且拿去恶心人。以及，房子太好看了。
好難看臥槽，快哭了。被超能力設定吸引而看，被俗套爛大街的劇情勸退。
最后的九亿少女的梦的花妞狗狗找的漂亮。
看了预告片之后，感兴趣的还以为这种设定多新奇呢，结果关于这个新奇设定的东西，在预告片就全讲完了，哎呀，真的是好烂的一部电影啊！
奉金送客又回头，三人座谈赎身费。
好難看臥槽，快哭了。被超能力設定吸引而看，被俗套爛大街的劇情勸退。
所有配角都很出彩
电影看完了，没看过原作不做点评，就电影这个故事走向，真的奇幻，奇幻得不得了，不是仅仅一个“奇幻”能形容的……
套了一个有趣的概念，实则却是自愿降智才能坚持下来的闹剧，很明显导演在网梗与网红的融入上用了比剧本打磨大得多的心思。全片比比皆是各种脆弱的行为逻辑、幼稚的人物动机与敷衍的创作态度，靠雷劈治病、靠还物洗白，偷来的东西还回去就是好人，女神的男友劈腿就能抱得美人归，大连元素与东北文化再一次被低水准消费，各种隐晦而尴尬的黄段子再一次强奸了观众的眼睛。如果导演可以踏实地仅仅讲好一个与物品对话的小寓言，影片反而不至于如此混乱，而恰恰是眼高手低与自我陶醉，使创意变得廉价、逻辑不堪一击、人物扭向卡通，以至于频频感觉焦俊艳、王彦霖、张雪峰下一秒会被降智操作逼到笑场，只能说张子栋是被市场大大低估的宝藏演员。
整体还是挺搞笑的，伴随着男主的变好，周围的物对他的态度也变了，感觉整个人都好了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
